Comments for threeman.org

Comment on Syriana? Part 2 by Syriana? Part 1 | threeman.org

Syriana? Part 1 | threeman.org — Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:32:13 +0000

[...] Mention of Antioch in the Economist article above leads on to the more esoteric aspect of the Syrian crisis, which will be addressed in the second and final part of this article. [...]

Comment on Syriana? Part 1 by Syriana? Part 2 | threeman.org

Syriana? Part 2 | threeman.org — Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:29:40 +0000

[...] The first part of this article (in New View #69 Oct-Dec2013) outlined some of the economic and geopolitical aspects to the current war in Syria. Since it was written and published, there have been major developments in the region. Following a vote rejecting military action against Syria by the UK Parliament on 29 August, US President Barack Obama called off what had seemed in late August to be an imminent western attack on Syria after unproven Anglo-American claims that the Syrian government had committed a genocidal gas attack against its own people on 21 August in Ghouta, Damascus. Then on 23/24 November came an agreement in Geneva between Iran and six major powers (US, UK, Russia, China, France, Germany) for a temporary suspension of western economic sanctions against Iran in return for Iran scaling back elements of its nuclear programme. The deal was hailed as ‘historic’ by Obama’s allies but by his opponents it was seen as “Munich II”, a crass example of the worst kind of appeasement, once again the usual comparison here being made between any opponent of the USA and Adolf Hitler (1). Since Iran has been a major supporter of the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, it is also being said that the agreement with Iran may bring a breakthrough in the Syrian crisis. As the forces supported by the US, UK and France in the Syrian war appear to be losing ground not only to the Syrian army but also to the more fanatical Sunni Islamist fighters and other assorted mercenary fighters sponsored by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, it seems that some in the West may now be thinking that the best hope for getting rid of Assad may not be by war after all but through a deal with the Iranians. Needless to say, this prospect does not please those in the region who regard Iran as their inveterate enemy, namely, Israel and the conservative Sunni Arab monarchies of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. However, before we assume that all are acting in good faith in this agreement, and that a general peace is about to break out in the Middle East, we should perhaps recall that optimism about Munich in the autumn of 1938 was followed a year later by the outbreak of war in Europe, while before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914, relations between Britain and Germany had actually been at their best for several years (2). Even in the teutophobic Foreign Office it was felt, notably by Sir Edward Grey’s secretary, Sir William Tyrrell, that from 1913 Britain was “relieved, at least for a long time to come, of [what he called] the German menace” (3). Yet within 5 weeks of Sarajevo, the two countries were at war! Much could yet go wrong therefore with the US-Iran deal. [...]

Comment on On the Esoteric Significance of Kaspar Hauser by “Etheric Christ glimpses 1″ by Bradford Riley | Rileybrad's Blog

Sat, 30 Mar 2013 19:08:42 +0000

[...] has been set into the foundations of the world within the tangible number 33. On 17 December 1833 Kaspar Hauser (Click Link) was stabbed to death; in 1933 was the burning of the Reichstag and the launch of Nazism and the [...]

Comment on “The Wounded Cavalier” as a key to understanding British history by Shakespeare | vita brevis, ars longa

Shakespeare | vita brevis, ars longa — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:25:35 +0000

[...] Der letzte Satz mit den cataleptic damsels and drooping knights that infest this art gefällt mit besonders gut. Man kann ganze Romane in diese Szene hineinlesen. Hat die Braut des miesepetrigen Puritaner etwas mit dem sterbenden Cavalier gehabt? Das sind so die Dinge, die die Viktorianer lieben. Kitsch und Sentiment und leicht zu entziffernde ?Symbolik. [...]

Comment on SHINTARO ISHIHARA – A DANGEROUS INCENDIARY in the JAPAN-CHINA ISLANDS DISPUTE by Incendiary | English Language Tutorials

Incendiary | English Language Tutorials — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:39:29 +0000

[...] Jack and Mike are incendiaries in our community; always trying to instigate the public to take up arms and rebel against anybody and for anything. For a news article that shows us how we come across this word in this sense, please click here. [...]